WWF report finds massive inefficiencies in EU's ETS scheme

By Cameron Saunders
The scheme was designed so that companies would have to pay for their carbon footprints; instead they have been reaping a €100bn windfall over ten years

A recent report by the WWF has found major holes in the European Union’s Emission Trading System (ETS), which oversaw the distribution of climate permits over the last nine years. It found that €98.5bn in free permits had been dished out to heavy industrial polluters, a move that was in “direct contradiction with the polluter pays principle.” 

A carbon permit allows industries to emit CO2 freely into the atmosphere despite the fact that they should, in theory, be paying the price for polluting. The ETS was first introduced in 2005 to incentivize decarbonization. 

Among the heavy emitting industries that received these permits from the 2013-2021 window of time that the report investigates, were steel, cement, chemicals and aviation. None of these permits came with any stipulations that the recipients increase the energy efficiency of their operations, the report noted. Furthermore, these recipients were permitted to sell the permits they did not use to other companies, creating billions in profits for themselves. 

An imbalance in purpose

The €98.5bn in permits were more than the €88.5bn that the EU charged polluters for their CO2 emissions. 

According to Romain Laugier, the report’s author and a policy officer at the WWF European Policy Office: “This analysis shows that for the last decade, the ETS was based on a ‘polluters-don’t-pay principle’ – with billions and billions of foregone revenue that EU countries could instead have invested in industrial decarbonisation.

“EU negotiators should phase out free allowances as soon as possible, and in the meantime make sure companies that receive them meet strict conditions on cutting their emissions.”

Of the money that was raised from the ETS, the report noted, a full third was not spent on the climate crisis at all. The report concluded that countries receiving ETS moneys ought to be required to spend these gains on climate change-related problems and not at the sole discretion of national governments.

Share
Share
Author

Featured Articles

US and EU partnership on AI to improve climate forecasting

The US and EU have announced an agreement to speed up the development of AI to improve agriculture, healthcare and climate forecasting

The highs and lows of COP from 1995 to the present day

Sustainability Magazine takes a look at some of the milestones – and setbacks – of the United Nations’ Convention on Climate Change over the years

Top 10: Sustainability conferences around the world

With 2023 in full swing, what better time to look at what the year ahead offers in terms of international conferences focusing on sustainability

Top 10: Sustainable data centre companies

Net Zero

Payments company Flywire issues extensive ESG report

ESG

UN envoy Bloomberg unveils plan to limit coal use

Net Zero