Sustainability Gaps Risk Critical Supply Chain Transparency

Environmental regulations are reshaping how organisations approach supply chain management. As governments worldwide introduce stricter sustainability requirements, businesses are discovering significant gaps in their ability to monitor and verify the environmental performance of their supplier networks. This lack of visibility could mean that sustainability commitments remain unfulfilled and compliance standards unmet.

According to research by Achilles, a leader in risk management, organisations are struggling to maintain transparency across their supply chains at a time when environmental accountability has become non-negotiable. The firm's annual Global Supplier Risk and Sustainability Survey, which gathered responses from 2,805 organisations across construction, energy, manufacturing, transport and the public sector, reveals that sustainability priorities are rising but visibility into supplier practices remains dangerously limited.

The findings could signal trouble for C-suite leaders tasked with meeting increasingly stringent environmental regulations whilst maintaining operational resilience. With climate risks escalating and regulatory scrutiny intensifying, the ability to trace and verify sustainability practices throughout the supply chain has moved from competitive advantage to business necessity.

Environmental blind spots across supplier networks

The research reveals a critical transparency problem. Only 6% of organisations report having full visibility into Tier-2 and Tier-3 suppliers, whilst nearly half of respondents admit to limited or no visibility beyond their immediate supplier base. For sustainability leaders, this creates a significant challenge. Without clear sight of extended supplier networks, organisations cannot accurately measure their full environmental footprint or ensure compliance with emerging regulations.

Supply chains have become increasingly complex, with higher exposure to environmental risks that can emerge anywhere within the network. Ongoing regulatory expansion around environmental performance, combined with growing stakeholder expectations around climate action and sustainable practices, is putting pressure on organisations to demonstrate accountability across every tier of their supply chain.

The report highlights a troubling confidence gap. Only 18% of organisations state they are very confident in the accuracy of supplier-reported safety data. This lack of trust extends to environmental data, where verification mechanisms remain inadequate and self-reporting by suppliers often goes unchallenged.

Adam Whitfield, Head of Global Compliance and ESG at Achilles, explains:

"Supply chains today are more complex, more interconnected and more exposed to disruption than ever before. Organisations are facing growing pressure from regulators, investors and customers to demonstrate transparency and accountability across their supplier networks. Our research shows that while many companies recognise the importance of supplier risk management, visibility across extended supply chains remains limited. This creates uncertainty precisely where organisations need the greatest oversight, particularly as sustainability expectations and regulatory requirements continue to expand."

Adam emphasises that building resilience requires more than periodic supplier assessments:

"Organisations need structured supplier data, consistent governance and continuous monitoring to identify emerging risks early and intervene before problems escalate."

Sustainability, procurement and supply chain leaders won’t want to miss Sustainability LIVE: The US Summit, taking place at Navy Pier, Chicago, on April 21–22.

Co-located with Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE, the event unites senior decision-makers at a time when supply chains, sustainability and business performance are more interdependent than ever.

Secure your place now for The US Summit – group booking discounts available.

Regulatory fragmentation hampers sustainability progress

Environmental legislation has become a core driver of sustainability initiatives, according to the research, outpacing customer expectations and voluntary carbon-reduction commitments. However, inconsistency across national regulations has created significant challenges. According to 75% of respondents, maintaining consistent supplier requirements across borders has become increasingly difficult as different jurisdictions introduce varying environmental standards.

For organisations operating globally, this regulatory fragmentation could mean compliance gaps and increased exposure to environmental liabilities. Traceability has become essential, as has due diligence and continuous monitoring of supplier environmental performance. Yet nearly 60% of organisations express concern about the long-term availability of suppliers, as growing regulatory demands impact supplier capacity to meet environmental standards.

Confidence levels remain modest. The research shows that 64% of organisations report their suppliers being only moderately or mostly prepared to meet rising environmental standards, with just 11% stating their suppliers are fully prepared. This preparation gap could leave organisations vulnerable as regulations tighten and scrutiny of supply chain emissions intensifies.

The divergence in regulatory approaches across regions means that organisations must navigate multiple compliance frameworks simultaneously. This not only increases administrative burden but also creates complexity in establishing unified sustainability standards across global supplier networks. Companies are finding themselves caught between meeting local requirements in individual markets while attempting to maintain consistent environmental performance expectations throughout their operations.

Technology adoption faces structural barriers

There is growing interest in deploying AI within supplier risk management, with many organisations exploring AI-driven insights to improve environmental monitoring and decision-making across their supplier networks. However, adoption remains constrained by structural challenges including inadequate supplier data, legacy platforms and disconnected systems.

Achilles has found that companies with more mature governance frameworks are better positioned to deploy risk monitoring technologies across their operations. However, a significant gap exists between organisations ready to embrace these tools and those still relying on fragmented processes. For sustainability leaders, this technology gap could mean missed opportunities to identify environmental risks early and take corrective action before compliance issues arise.

The digital transformation required to achieve comprehensive supplier visibility demands significant investment in both infrastructure and capability building. Many organisations face the challenge of integrating new technologies with existing systems whilst simultaneously improving the quality and consistency of supplier data. Without this foundation, even the most sophisticated monitoring tools cannot deliver the insights needed to manage environmental risks effectively across complex supply chains.

The research suggests that organisations must prioritise modernising their technology infrastructure and developing deeper supplier transparency. Without these capabilities, businesses could find themselves unable to verify sustainability claims, vulnerable to regulatory penalties and exposed to reputational damage as stakeholders demand greater environmental accountability throughout the supply chain.

As environmental regulations continue to expand and climate risks intensify, the ability to maintain comprehensive visibility across supplier networks will increasingly determine which organisations can credibly deliver on their sustainability commitments and which will struggle to demonstrate compliance.