WWF: 40 Luxury French Brands Lack Nature-Based Security

Despite biodiversity and nature-based solutions becoming more recognised for economic and financial stability, France’s 40 biggest companies remain largely unprepared, according to WWF.

WWF has released its Nat 40 Index, studying nature-related disclosures within the scope of the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive.

Each company was ranked on various different sustainability progresses and initiatives; however, the index found that no company has a fully formalised Nature Transition Plan.

Ranking luxury companies

To set a clear baseline for corporate performance, the report introduces the NAT 40 Index, which ranks the 40 largest listed French companies based solely on information disclosed in their audited Universal Registration Documents. 

The methodology evaluates corporate disclosures across the four nature-related dimensions of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards: pollution, water and oceans, biodiversity and the circular economy. 

Rather than directly measuring absolute physical impacts on the ground, the scoring framework evaluates the maturity of corporate practices across five core transition plan components: foundations (such as double materiality assessments), metrics and targets, implementation strategies, stakeholder engagement and governance. 

Each component is scored using a four-level maturity scale ranging from "Non-Aligned" (0) and "Compliant" (1) to "Coherent" (2) and "Credible" (3). 

These individual evaluations are then aggregated into a weighted final score out of 100, prioritising actionable implementation strategies and financing plans to determine a company's relative position in the index.

A key theme of the report is that climate disruption and biodiversity loss are inseparable, serving as twin dimensions of the same ecological crisis. 

Despite 80% of the 40 luxury companies having established validated Science-Based Target initiative targets, corporate strategy remains unsustainably asymmetrical, treating nature and ecosystem protection as secondary concerns. 

Sustainability requires corporations to treat biodiversity loss, water stress, chemical pollution and resource extraction with the same strategic urgency as carbon reductions. 

“Biodiversity loss, air, soil and water pollution, the depletion of natural resources and ecosystem degradation jeopardise the stability of our societies and the resilience of our business models,” says Alexandra Palt, President of WWF France, in the Nat 40 Index.

“Given these challenges, corporate responsibility is crucial. 

“By analysing key themes – pollution, water, biodiversity and the circular economy – this report highlights encouraging initiatives but also reveals a persistent gap between stated commitments and the actions or resources actually deployed.”

To prevent severe greenwashing risks, WWF urges businesses to deploy holistic transition plans that explicitly map out how their physical and financial operations aim to respect planetary boundaries and actively support international biodiversity frameworks.

Supply chains and creating sustainable procurement

The report evaluates several top performers whose business models are heavily reliant on agriculture and delicate natural resources, including leading luxury and food entities such as Kering, LVMH, Carrefour, L'Oréal, Hermès, Pernod Ricard and Danone. 

Sustainability leaders won’t want to miss Sustainability LIVE: The Leadership Summit at London Climate Action Week, taking place at Code Node on 25 June 2026.

Register now for this exclusive invite-only event. 

While this leading group demonstrates convincing materiality analyses, their overall supply chains remain deeply vulnerable due to an overwhelming lack of granular, location-specific data. 

Corporate procurement policies seem to rely on vague, voluntary certification schemes that offer little evidence of effectively reducing ecological pressures.

“Improving transparency, traceability and collaborative action in the value chain can help businesses address impacts and dependencies (well established),” writes IPBES, 2026.

Sustainable procurement requires moving past mere compliance and establishing longer-term sourcing relationships that actively restore local ecosystems.

Heavy industries and sustainable manufacturing

An intermediate tier of evaluated companies includes industrial giants across heavy manufacturing, infrastructure development and transport infrastructure, including Michelin, Veolia Environnement, Renault, Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield, ACCOR, Eiffage, Air Liquide, Bureau Veritas, EssilorLuxottica, Bouygues and Airbus. 

This tier also covers sector peers such as Vinci, Eurofins Scientific, Stellantis, ArcelorMittal, Saint-Gobain, Sanofi and Schneider Electric. 

Across these organisations, strategic commitments remain localised or restricted to direct operations, largely neglecting the immense indirect footprint of manufacturing processes and equipment production. 

“The action plans of CAC 40 companies are often poorly structured, insufficiently deployed across the full value chain and very rarely accompanied by financing plans,” writes the Index.

“As the cost of inaction continues to rise, companies must move beyond risk mitigation and act guided by science to reduce their impact on nature,” says Christopher Rannou, Senior Natural Capital Officer at WWF France, in the Nat 40 Index.

“Developing fully costed and financed nature transition plans is not just a signal beyond short-term profit, it is essential to align business practices with planetary boundaries, build resilience and secure a long-term licence to operate.”

The environmental blind spots of technology, mining and energy financing

A group of particular concern features high-tech industrial and engineering companies, alongside financial institutions that screen out nature issues entirely. 

Technology and high-tech defence infrastructure leaders such as Dassault Systèmes, Capgemini, STMicroelectronics, Thales and Orange exhibit an alarming underestimation of their direct and indirect footprints. 

Their growing reliance on data centres and advanced hardware places severe, unmitigated pressures on freshwater resources and land take.

“Nature loss is a material economic risk that urgently needs to be addressed, yet most major companies continue to treat nature decline – from biodiversity collapse to freshwater scarcity, soil degradation and the depletion of natural resources – as a peripheral topic rather than a core strategic issue,” says Guillaume Wahl, ESG Expert at WWF France, in the Nat 40 Index.

Similarly, the energy sector, represented by TotalEnergies and Engie, and technology developers heavily rely on critical metals and mineral resources sourced from global mining operations without establishing reliable value chain traceability.

Despite the importance, the index found that Thales, Safran and STMicroelectronics fail to register biodiversity as a material factor altogether, despite their extensive structural dependencies on natural resources. 

This critical blind spot is mirrored in the banking and financial sector, including major players Euronext, AXA, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, and Société Générale, who typically view all nature-related risks as non-material to their multi-billion-euro investment portfolios. 

Aligning financial flows and technology investments with sustainability goals is the ultimate frontier. Central banks and institutions must explicitly treat nature as a strategic priority in lending and asset management.